Establishment of Sri Lanka Forum for Small Scale Fisheries (SLFSSF)

THE OBJECTIVE

“Small-scale fisheries make an important contribution to nutrition, food security, sustainable livelihoods and poverty alleviation – especially in developing countries. Despite this significant contribution, the issues constraining the sustainable development of small-scale fisheries remain poorly understood” (FAO). SL is no exception to this rule.

Sri Lanka’s population consume relatively large amounts of fish (an average of 10.8 kg/yr), while 570,000 people find direct or indirect employment in the fishing industry. The marine fishing population consists of 190,000 households and 221,000 thousand active fishers spread out along the coastline, while another 48,900 fishing households and 54, 450 active fishers are engaged in lagoons and inland water bodies. The total fisheries dependent population has been estimated as 2.7 million. Arguably, all of these fishers and people involved in processing and marketing are engaged in the small-scale sector. Small-scale fishers in Sri Lanka are of many kinds. While some are beach-based, others use a variety of craft – orus, kattumarams, or fibre-glass boats – to ply nearshore, offshore, lagoon or inland fishing grounds. Gears include a broad selection of gillnets, cast nets, long lines, fixed nets and traps. While men generally dominate the harvesting process, women play an important part in processing, marketing and in support activities. Sri Lanka’s ‘large scale’ fisheries is confined to the ‘off-shore and deep sea’ sub-sector, consisting of a fleet of 4,218 multiday crafts, length varying from 32 ft to 45 ft, rather small-scale crafts in comparison to fisheries of developed nations. Yet, a clear distinction exists between this fleet from the rest; owned generally by non-fishing investors, use hired labour, targeting expensive fish like tuna and producing for the export market.

Sri Lanka’s aquaculture is of fairly recent origin. Despite large fresh water and brackish-water resources, only marine shrimp aquaculture and ornamental fish culture have been developed to a certain extent. About 17,000 are actively involved in the aquaculture sector. Nevertheless, shrimp and finfish production is growing. Today, the country’s main focus is to start small-scale aquaculture, aiming at supporting rural communities with income and food security.

In SL, as well as globally, that small-scale fisheries are threatened more by anthropogenic pressures coming from both inside and outside the communities, and less by natural factors. High rates of resource exploitation, unregulated technological change, increasing fishing pressure, etc. are causing threats to aquatic ecosystems, leading to resource degradation. It is known that although blue revolution resulted in significant increases in fish catches, it has also resulted in increasing fishing pressure on resources and signs of degradation of resources are quite evident, which compelled the state, as the custodian of the resources, to intervene in protecting the resources from further degradation. Thus state laws mainly aimed at dealing effectively with the resource crisis and their focus on fisher wellbeing was poor or more distant (long run). For fishers who are vulnerable to poverty, and having limited access to livelihood capitals (to cope with vulnerability), one option is to use heavy rates of resource exploitation to meet the needs of their families. This is quite understandable, given that poor people use high rates in discounting future gains.

While fisheries cooperatives have played a very important role in the past as a kind of state-community partnerships, providing fishers with livelihood capitals and helping them to cope with vulnerability, many of them collapsed when various governments tried to introduce alternative structures to meet their short term political goals. Unfortunately, Sri Lanka’s research is biased towards ‘ecosystem’ research rather than research on the human system; the fishing communities. Very little is heard of the issues facing small scale fisheries, although these are of tremendous importance. What we have leant from research is pre-dominantly scientific; fisheries biology, oceanography, fish diseases, aquaculture, fish population dynamics, etc. with very little focus on small-scale fisheries, especially on small scale fishing communities who are confronted with an array of issues, such as lack of rights, their non-inclusiveness in fisheries decision making, lack of voice, resource degradation and declining livelihoods & wellbeing, etc.

On top of the above, climate change is now entering the SSF development equation an important variable. These impacts are mostly felt in coastal areas, which are to a great extent, inhabited by fishing populations. Sea level rise has caused loss of landing centers, beach seining sites, fish drying sites, displacement of fishing populations, etc. Food chain in marine habitats has been affected with declines in certain species, which have affected fishing landings, production and fishing incomes. Ocean acidification has caused gradual disappearance of shell fish such as mussels and lobsters. Lagoon ecosystems are also been affected by sea water intrusion causing a decline in productivity. Wetlands form another resource highly vulnerable to climate change, with loss of habitats, reduced bio-diversity and reduced ecosystem services. Again, climate change research too is science-biased; sea level rise, increasing temperatures, impacts on mangroves and biodiversity, etc., with little focus on the impact of climate change on the social system; the various strategies adopted by people to cope with climate change and the impact of such strategies on their wellbeing. Among many populations, those living in coastal areas confront the highest climate change risks which have very serious implications on the wellbeing of fishing communities who form the most important coastal stakeholder group.

Small-scale fisheries deserve attention not just for their problems, such as poverty, but also for the opportunities they provide in addressing important societal concerns that exist beyond the sector, such as providing safe and nutritious food and employment. But small-scale fisheries do more than just provide society with a service’, but they are important in themselves. SSF represent cultural heritage, they offer a way of life, a particular lifestyle that provides both identity and meaning to the lives of those who inhabit them. Some argue that SSF are not alwaysan occupation of last resort’.

The FAO has recently developed a vision for small-scale fisheries where, a. the contribution of small-scale fisheries to sustainable development is fully-realized; b. small-scale fishers and fish workers are not marginalized and, c. importance of small-scale fisheries to national economies and food security is recognized, valued and enhanced. The vision also recognizes that those dependent on the small-scale fisheries sector should be empowered to participate in decision-making with dignity and respect through integrated management of the social, economic and ecological systems underpinning the sector. The recently developed SSF Voluntary Guidelines capture the inherent features of small scale fisheries by addressing the most compelling issues in SSF, especially, the need to recognize the rights of fishing people and to make the process of fisheries management participatory, inclusive, integrated and holistic with special concern on women and marginalized populations. All efforts made towards sustainable small scale fisheries, especially the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries and SSF guidelines, would be futile unless they are incorporated into the policy making and planning process. This does not take place automatically. Moreover, they are not blanket recommendations, but guidelines, and what is to be adopted or incorporated into national plans of action depend on specific contexts of countries. Governments have an important role to play in controlling essential legal, financial, technical resources in adopting the most appropriate guidelines. This needs a strong political will to do so. Today many governments in developing countries are moving from “government to governance”, including governance of fisheries. The recent efforts at establishing fisheries co-management platforms in Sri Lanka, is a good example, which is an essential and timely initiative. Such forms of Interactive Governance put pressure on governments to become more accommodating to stakeholder interests and concerns. In this process, the CSOs have an important role to play in awareness building, functioning as a watch dog and raising the voice when things go wrong. Since challenges that SL are facing are also identifiable throughout South Asia and the world, lessons learnt in SL would also provide lessons that go beyond SL, while at the same time SL can benefit from learning about how these challenges are dealt with elsewhere. This requires extending our tentacles beyond national boundaries to establish links with regional and international organisations working for SSF.

It is for the above reason that a “Small Scale Fisheries Forum” is to be established. We invite all academics, researchers, interest groups and individuals to come forward to join hands, aiming at establishing interactive platforms to share information and broaden our knowledge of SSF, voicing the needs of the small scale fishing communities, provide policy inputs to government and establish links with regional and international organisations who are working towards Sustainable SSF.

THE SLFSSF BLUEPRINT

  • Establish platforms to disseminate /share information on SSF,
  • Voice the needs of the small scale fishing communities,
  • Promote joint research on SSF
  • To liaise with the government in an advisory capacity to promote government interventions towards sustainable development of small scale fisheries.
  • Provide policy inputs to the government
  • To contribute towards the development, establishment and implementation of a national fisheries policy for Sri Lanka
  • Contribute towards incorporating recommendations of the FAO Voluntary Guidelines to relevant national legislation, policies, strategies as well as to programmes and activities of CSOs/NGOs
  • Establish links with regional and international organisations who are working towards Sustainable SSF.

FUTURE COURSE OF ACTION (SHORT TERM GOAL)

A. To ensure the implementation of the FAO Voluntary Guidelines for food security and poverty alleviation in Small-Scale Fisheries.

Based on the Project Results Matrix of the FAO, the following course of action is suggested to achieve this aim.

  1. The Kick-Off Meeting of the SSF Forum
  2. First Sensitizing and Awareness Building Workshop for Government Officers
  3. Preparation of Communication tools
  4. Four stakeholder awareness building workshops in the North, East, West and the South
  5. Assessment and reviewing existing policy
  6. Building up regional global links (TBTI, ICSF)
  7. Funding
  1. First Sensitizing and Awareness Building Workshop for Government Officers

SLFSSF will organize ‘an awareness building workshop’ for state officers, especially those from Ministry of Fisheries, Ministry of Environment, Department of Coast Conservation, Sri Lanka Fisheries Corporation, Sri Lanka Fisheries Harbour Corporation, etc.

The aim of this workshop is to build awareness of SSF Guidelines among all relevant state officers (under 1.1 of FAP Project Results Matrix) and to identify the most relevant guidelines to be incorporated into National Fisheries Policy and national plan of action on fisheries.

SLFSSF will organize the workshop and function as facilitators. It is expected to get the assistance of ICSF and TBTI for this initiative.

  1. Preparation of Communication tools

Awareness building and sensitizing diverse stakeholders on SSF guidelines require the preparation of communication tools. With a large diversity of expertise, the SLFSSF would identify the need for developing different types of communication tools (brochures, pamphlets, posters, booklets, etc.) and undertake to develop the required tools, which would later be used for stakeholder consultation and awareness building workshops to be held in various parts of the country. It is expected to obtain the assistance of ICSF and CSO’s in this endeavor.

  1. Four stakeholder Capacity Building, sensitizing and training workshops in the North, East, West and the South (section 1.1 and 3.3. of FAO Project Results Matrix)

SLFSSF would take the initiative to organize, FOUR stakeholder Capacity building and Consultation workshops in the following areas.
• North (Jaffna)
• East (Trincomalee)
• North West (Negombo)
• South (Galle / Tangalle)

The aim of these workshops is to build awareness among diverse fishworker organisations, including community based organisations and CSOs operating in the areas and to get their feed back on the SSF Guidelines and identify capacity building and training requirements. The workshops will be initiated, organized and conducted by the SLFSSF. The communication tools developed under 3 above, shall be used for capacity building and training the stakeholders participating in these workshops.

  1. Policy Workshop with State Actors

The SLFSSF will organize a series of discussions among its members to prepare a policy paper which is to be present at the policy workshop that follows. This requires first, an assessment of the present policy (section 2.1 of the FAO Project Results Matrix), identify its strength and weaknesses, the need for changes and incorporating relevant SSF guidelines, along with the required changes in the legislature.

SLFSSF will initiate a policy workshop , after the completion of stakeholder consultation workshops in different parts of the country.

The aim of the policy workshop is to decide on what policy measures are to incorporated into the present policy, what changes are to be made to it, what legal measures; laws, etc. to be brought in / changed, to ensure successful implementation of the SSF Guidelines.

  1. Building up regional global links (TBTI, ICSF)

As laid down under section 3.4 of the FAO Project Results Matrix, the SLFSSF will extend its tentacles to link up with regional and global organisations, such as the TBTI and ICSF, to share experiences, strengthen SSF regionally and to jointly monitor the SSF guideline implementation programme.

These regional and global links will help to share, disseminate information on SSF and assist in monitoring the SSF guideline implementation process as a regional platform, through jointly organized strategies; seminars, workshops, conferences, etc.

  1. Funding

It is expected to request funds from FAO and other CSO’s to fund the activities under sections 1 to 6 above. What is urgently required are funds to cover the costs of the ‘kick-off meeting’, to establish the Small Scale Fisheries Forum. Once the SLFSSF is established it will be in a strong position to request for international funds to implement the Course of Action outlined above.

B. Assist the Government in preparing the National Fisheries Policy (SHORT TERM)

Assist government in improving the draft fisheries Policy

C. Deliberate on issues associated SSF as they are brought to notice and take appropriate action in resolving them (LONG TERM)

Through discussions with appropriate authorities, stakeholder consultations, awareness building and capacity building activities, etc.

D. Knowledge sharing and dissemination; Organising interactive platforms; seminars, conferences (local, national and international) (LONG TERM)

SLFSSF Biennial International Congress

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *